Recently, I’ve heard a lot about soy foods. When I asked
people about the source of their beliefs, their response was often “I don’t
know, but I know I heard it somewhere” or “I’m not sure, but I heard it wasn’t
good so I just avoid it.” So, I went searching for a more concrete answer.
I first turned to Google to see what was being said, and I
found some pretty scary stuff out there. The problem is, none of what I found
was backed up by solid research. One person went so far as to call soy, and all beans for that matter, “evil food.”
I then turned to more research driven search engines such as PubMed, Google Scholar,
and Web of Science. All I could find there were studies reporting soy’s positive
influence on health. No wonder there is so much confusion!
So, what’s with all of the contradiction? A lot of what it
has to do with is the amount and type of research out there. But hopefully by
the end of this article things will be a bit more clear.
The back story…
To start, soy is a plant native to Asia that has been around
for at least 5,000 years (that’s a looooong time). It has been a part of
Chinese culture since the 2nd century, and came to the US in the
1700’s. It is an economically important crop, is easy to grow, and provides an
excellent source of protein for both humans and animals. In 1999, soy crops
made up 27% of the total crop area in the United States1.
Whole soy (like edamame) is chiefly made up of proteins,
isoflavones, lecithin, fiber, and phosophlipids (see diagram below)2.
Soy is an excellent form of vegetable protein, but is not a complete protein
because it lacks the essential amino acid methionine1. Isoflavones are compounds chemically similar
to estrogen in the body – also called phytoestrogens (no boys, it will not give you man-boobs). The two main types of
isoflavones are genestein and daidzen. Lecithin is a preservative found
naturally in a number of different foods as well as soy foods. Fiber is found mainly
in fruits, vegetables and whole grains, and to learn more read my previous blog entry.
![]() |
Soy components not in equal proportions as indicated. Image only for demonstration. |
Cardiovascular
Disease
According to the Mayo Clinic2, numerous human
studies report that adding soy protein to the diet can moderately reduce blood
cholesterol levels and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels - the "bad" cholesterol. Furthermore,
according to the majority of these studies, soy’s heart healthy effects can be
linked to phytoestrogens found naturally in the plant.
Cancer
The estrogen found in our bodies is linked to the progression of hormonally-sensitive
cancers (like breast and prostate cancer)3. In these types of
cancers tumors grow when estrogen locks to estrogen receptor cells, causing a
series of signals that instruct tumors to grow. However, phytoestrogens are
weak imitations of estrogen, and when it comes to tumor growth some
studies indicate phytoestrogens can help slow tumor growth. They do this by locking with
estrogen receptors and blocking estrogen from ever attaching to receptor sites3.
However, other studies like that of Dr. Bill Helferich, found that injecting genestein into
mice made breast tumors grow.4 It is important to note is that these studies are not as
influential on dietary recommendations because they occur in rodents and in isolated periods of time. So, as of
now, natural soy (tofu, edamame, milk, temphe, miso ect.) is thought to have a
protective effect against breast and prostate cancer.
If you take a look at studies of Asian populations, where
soy is a regular part of the diet, researchers have found that cancer risk is
about 24% lower in people who ate more soy when compared to those who ate less.3
Some studies suggest that the
protective effects of soy for breast cancer in Asian cultures is due to the
fact that consumption of soy begins at an early age, when breast tissue is still
developing 3. The jury is still out on that fact, but it will be
interesting to see if adding soy into the diet early on has any benefit.
Additionally, when it comes to cancer, natural soy has
antioxidant properties, which help reduce the formation of cancer-causing free
radicals.3, 5
Menopause
Because of soy’s high concentration of phytoestrogens it
was, at one time, believed that soy supplements were effective. However, an
article published in the New York Times states that American Menopause Foundations and the North American Menopause Society suggest that moderate soy
supplementation is ineffective in the treatment of menopause.4
Pediatrics
Many parents are naturally concerned about everything they
feed their child, and that’s a good thing. Most children go through a “picky”
phase making meal-time and nutrient intake challenging. So making sure your
child gets enough nutrition can be nerve racking! Furthermore, with the prevalence
of food allergies parents are more aware than ever of potential allergens in
our food supply.
Natural soy is an excellent source of protein and can be a
good alternative when allergies persist. However, if your child is allergic to peanuts
there is some evidence to suggest that they may also be allergic to soy milk as
well.1 So why not just supplement right away with almond or rice
milk? A great idea, but the problem is bioavailability, rather, how much
your child actually ends up absorbing. 1
When it comes to available nutrition, nothing is better than
cow’s milk- see diagram below. But if your child has an allergy, or you prefer
non-animal sources, I would first choose fortified soy milk, then almond milk,
then rice milk. But always choose a fortified
alternative to make sure they’re getting enough calcium to help bone
development.
Milk/"Milk"
Comparison chart (per 1 cup)*
|
|||||||
Calories
|
Fat/Saturated
|
Protein
|
Carbo-
hydrate |
Fiber
|
Calcium
|
Vitamin D
|
|
Cow’s
|
80-150 (nonfat to whole)
|
0.5-8 g fat/
0-5 g saturated |
8-9 g
|
12-13 g
|
0 g
|
30% DV
|
25% DV
|
Goat's
|
90-150 (nonfat to whole)
|
2.5-8 g fat/
1.5-5 g saturated |
7-8 g
|
9-12 g
|
0 g
|
30% DV
|
Up to 30% DV
|
Soy
|
60-130
|
2-6 g fat/
0-0.5 g saturated |
4-12 g
|
5-15 g
|
0-4 g
|
4-30% DV
|
Up to 30% DV
|
Rice
|
110-120
|
2.5 g fat/
0 g saturated |
1 g
|
20-24 g
|
0 g
|
2-25% DV
|
Up to 25%
DV
|
Almond
|
60-80
|
2.5-4.5 g
fat/
0-0.5 g saturated |
2-9 g
|
5-11 g
|
0-4 g
|
20-30% DV
|
Up to 25%
DV
|
Hemp
|
110-130
|
3-7 g fat/
1 g saturated |
4-5 g
|
6-20 g
|
1 g
|
2-46% DV
|
Up to 25%
DV
|
*Data reflects a sample of 20 readily available
milks/“milks.” For plant-based “milks,” we included only plain varieties—both
sweetened and unsweetened, when available.
Source: eatingwell.com6
|
(Tip: shake the container before pouring any calcium fortified juice
or milk. Calcium is a heavy element and will often sink to the bottom of the
container reducing the amount of calcium you get per serving!)
Challenges in
research
Every piece of literature I uncovered touting the benefits
of soy stressed the importance of further research to determine weather or not
soy can be recommended as a way to help prevent cancer. At this time the belief
is that natural soy (tofu, edamame, milk, temphe, miso ect.) may help protect
against cancer when eaten in moderation.5
As referenced earlier in the article, several rodent studies
have suggested that soy might encourage tumor growth. The difficulty with
animal studies is that this type of research occurs in a vacuum, where rodent subjects
are fed (typically injected) with only one type of food for defined period of time. While this type of
research is really important, we cannot make the direct link to humans because, well,
rats aren’t humans, we don’t live in cages, and we eat a lot of different
things.
According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer
(IARC)7, several types of epidemiological studies (human studies)
are considered when determining the cancer-causing effects of agents in our
environment. While I won’t bore you with them all, the IARC suggests that intervention
studies can provide strong evidence in determining something as cancer causing,
much like the studies linking smoking cessation to lung cancer did. But this is
not as easy when conducting dietary studies since our
diets are so variable.
In the end…
It is my guess that all of the fear and confusion comes from
the varied results among research. It’s natural to want to “air on the side of
caution” when it comes to preventing cancer, especially since their appears to
be some things we still don’t know.
However, when in doubt, I’m going to remind myself that soy
has been around for over 5,000 years! And, as of now, research suggests that
soy may help prevent heart disease and cancer.
Bottom line: Consume
natural forms of soy knowing that you’re doing something good for yourself. If
you want to prevent cancer DO NOT use any form of tobacco ever (that includes
cigarettes, cigars, and chewing tobacco), eat a variety of fruits and
vegetables, limit meat, exercise, and visit your doctor regularly.
1.
Friedman, Mendel; Brandon, David L. (2001).
Nutritional and Health Benefits of Soy Proteins. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 49, (3), 1069-1086.
2.
Natural Standard: The Authority on Integrative
Medicine. (2012). Soy (Glycine max). Retrieved from http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/soy/NS_patient-soy
3.
McCullough, Marji ScD, RD. (2012). The Bottom
Line on Soy and Breast Cancer Risk. Retrieved from http://www.cancer.org/cancer/news/expertvoices/post/2012/08/02/the-bottom-line-on-soy-and-breast-cancer-risk.aspx
4.
Tarkan, Laurie. (2004, August 24). As a
Substitute for Hormones, Soy is Ever More Popular, but Is It Safe?. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/24/health/as-a-substitute-for-hormones-soy-is-ever-more-popular-but-is-it-safe.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm
5.
Miller, Paige F. PhD, MPH, RD; Snyder, Denise C.
MS, RD, CSO, LDN. (2012). Phytochemicals and Cancer Risk: A Review of the
Epidemiological Evidence. Nutrition in
Clinical Practice, 27 (5), 599-612.
6.
Meredith Corporation. (2013) A Buyers Guide to
Milk Alternatives. Retrieved from http://www.eatingwell.com/healthy_cooking/healthy_cooking_101/shopping_cooking_guides/a_buyer_s_guide_to_milk_part_ii
7.
The World Health Organization International
Agency on Research for Cancer. (2006). IARC
Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Preamble. Pg. 8,
Lyon, France.
No comments:
Post a Comment